Now for something completely different (LXXIV)

Some things are worth repeating, especially when the holiday season brings out Judy Hynes for another year!

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

One of my favorite Christmas movies is White Christmas.   With music by Irving Berling, it tells the story of a famous male singing duo who fall in love with a not-so-famous female singing duo at a Vermont sky lodge without any snow.    Judy Haynes was played by Vera-Ellen, while her sister Betty was played by Rosemary Clooney.   Clearly, Betty was the singing star – but Judy burned the stage with her dancing.   Here Judy sings with Betty the infamous song  Sisters, Sisters …

… and then here is a clever mash-up of Judy dancing Abraham with John Brascia.

Leave a comment

Posted by on December 18, 2017 in something completely different


Tags: , ,

Judith in the Pink

“In the pink” means in very good health, very good condition, physically and emotionally.  While del Moro’s Judith obviously fits this description, Holofernes obviously does not.

Battista del Moro (1514-1573/75), “Judith with the head of Holofernes,” c1550-1555, Oil on canvas, Florence, Fondazione di Studi di Storia dell’Arte Roberto Longhi


This Judith emerged from the private collection of Roberto Longhi to be part of the exhibition “From Giotto to Caravaggio The passions of Roberto Longhi”  presented March 27 to July 20, 2015 at the Jacquemart-André Museum in Paris. The focus of the exhibition was a comparison of “the works of Caravaggio and those of his imitators, showing the influence of this artist’s themes and style on his contemporaries, first in Italy and then throughout Europe.” The exhibit also provided a glimpse into the artistic vision and careful collection of Roberto Longhi, considered the epitome of an art connoisseur and leading authority on Renaissance artists – especially Caravaggio.

As part of this exhibit, Battista del Moro comes centuries after Giotto (c.1270-1337) and decades before Caravaggio (1571-1610) – but this work is included as a possible “training piece” for Carravagio. It is speculated that he would have seen something like this and noted –

Del Moro plays wonderfully on the contrasts, in the idealized face of Judith and the more popular of her maid and between the decorative richness of the decor and the funeral character of the scene, accentuated by the macabre detail of the sinister look of Holofernes.

I don’t know that I would go so far as to describe this scene as funereal – although it is certainly macabre. Funereal suggests that there is grief involved and some tribute to the deceased. Instead, Judith and the maid seem anxious to escape and not at all troubled about having decapitated the general – and  I doubt if they will ask any one to prepare a eulogy for Holofernes. But the tension in the scene – the turn of Judith’s face away from the viewer, the maid receding in the shadow – those are elements that may have influenced Carravaggio in his own depiction of the carnage. And of course he made the scene darker – much, much darker – and less opulent.

Of course, I always worry about those jewels getting in the way and stains creeping onto the lovely fabrics. It would be a shame to mess up that lovely shade of pink with blood splatter.






Leave a comment

Posted by on December 14, 2017 in No category


Tags: ,

Judith: Before and After


Antonio Gionima (1697–1732), “Judith Presenting Herself to Holofernes,” 1720s, Oil on canvas, 171.45 x 125.73 cm, Minneapolis Institute of Art, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA


Antonio Gionima (1697–1732), “Judith with the Head of Holofernes,” 1720s, Oil on canvas, 177×88 cm, reported in 1984 Antique market, Turin, Italy – photo in Federico Zeri Foundation, University of Bologna, Italy )

This before-and-after of Judith is the work of Antonio Gionima, a partner of the late-Baroque period who exemplified the grand classical style of 18th-century Bologna. His promising career was cut short by his death from tuberculosis at age thirty-five.

Many of Gionima’s surviving works illustrate Old Testament subjects in strongly expressive compositions, dramatic chiaroscuro, and the elaborate mixing of wash, white bodycolour and occasionally oil paint in his drawings. Some considered him to be the most exciting painter in Bologna in the decade before his death. But Gionima appears to have a marketing problem: most of his commissions were not for public sites but instead went to private collectors – and thus he was neglected by later critics.

Which might explain how I got this far in the blog without noticing his work.

+  +  +  +  +

If you want to see a much more colorful image of “Judith Presenting Herself to Holofernes” (though much smaller), jump over to Artwork of the month: Judith (December 10, 2008) in the blog The Aesthetics of Composition in Abstract Painting. He must have a better camera than the museum. While you’re there, check out the other Judith’s residing in Minneapolis. She appears to be quite popular there.














Posted by on December 13, 2017 in No category


Tags: , , ,

Now for something completely different (LXXXII)

So I am watching one of my favorite Christmas movies – one I have watched about 10 times before – and suddenly I hear “My name is Judy.”

What? After all these years I realize that Love Actually has a character named Judy?

Yes it is true. And she plays a pivotal part. A part that can’t be missed. It was probably up for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.

Or maybe Best Supported Actress.

Well, anyway … you decide.  Here is Joanna Page as Judy. And that other guy, it’s only Martin Freeman of Sherlock and The Hobbit.

Leave a comment

Posted by on December 12, 2017 in No category


Tags: ,

Judith as the Runner Up

This rather ferocious Judith is one of those artworks that seems to be lost. Not just to me – but truly lost.

François Victor Bazin (1897-1956), “Judith and Holofernes,” 1925 (Prix de Rome)

The sculpture titled “Judith and Holofernes” is the work of François Victor Bazin (1897-1956), and it won runner-up for the 1925 Prix de Rome  – a scholarship that supports French art students in Rome.  Bazin was enrolled in the the Paris École des Beaux-Art at the age of 16, after his parents returned from teaching as engravers and medalists in Chile during his childhood.  But three years later in 1916 during the First World War, he joined the fledgling French air force and was assigned to Escadrille SPA.164, passing his pilot’s license in 1918.

(And for those who don’t know about the French air force: SPA means his division flew bi-planes manufactured by SPAD – Société Pour L’Aviation et res Derives. Bi-planes … think about it.)

“Vieux Charles 2” Spad VII (1916), Le Bourget Air and Space Museum, Paris, France

After the war, Bazin completed his studies and was contacted by the Hispano Suiza Company to create the radiator cap of their future cars. They requested that it be based on the bird motif that adorned the bi-plane “Vieux Charles” flown by French national hero Georges Guynemer. Bazin was so successful that between 1920 and 1935 he created a large number of mascots for car bonnets (“les bouchons de radiator” aka hood ornaments): Stork (1920, Hispano Suiza), Mangbetu Woman (Cruise Black Citroen), Triumph (Isotta Fraschini), elephant head (Latil), Centaur (Unic), Unicorn (Unicorn). Several have been recast by Bazin’s granddaughter and can be purchased here.

“Cigogne” for the Hispano Suiza

“Tête d’éléphant” for the Latil

“Triomphe” for the Isotta Fraschini

“Licorne” for the Licorice

“Centaure” for the Unic

“Tête de Femme Mangbetu” for Citroën

Bazin also completed commissions for numerous commemorative public monuments in Brittany that span the two World Wars, including:

  • A bronze and two bas-reliefs on the monument to Jean Bourhis, an early French aviator (1922)
  • “Aux bigoudens” by the side of the river at Pont-l’Abbé (1931)
  • “Aux filles de la mer” near the Pont Firmin in the rue Jacques Cartier in Quimper (1939)
  • Bronze for the tomb of Adolphe Duparc in Quimper’s Cathédrale Saint-Corentin (1946)
  • Monument to the Bretons of Free France, known as the Cross of Pen-Hir (1949)
  • He also was an accomplished medallist for municipalities in the region

Unfortunately I can find no record of what happened to his statue of Judith that nearly won the prize. His grand-daughter, Julie Bazin, is equally perplexed. We both thought that the Beaux Arts might still have it because they have traditionally kept the works of former students in their collections – and because they have Bazin’s plaster bust “La Volonté” which he completed for the school’s competition “La Tête d’expression” in 1922. However, in her correspondence with them, Mme Bazin has yet to receive information on its location.

In the meantime, she was kind enough to share these additional photographs.

François Victor Bazin (1897-1956), “Judith and Holofernes,” courtesy of Julie Bazin,

Alas, it would be amazing to see firsthand the intensity of this Judith. Standing on the balls of her feet, she is arched forward.  Her left hand holding the fauchion is extended fully behind her and her right hand holding the severed head is extended fully upward in front of her. Her head is slightly bowed with the exertion. She reminds me of a dancer or a diver giving her full energy to reaching outside herself, poised to launch forward with her bloody prize.

Yes, I can envision this as an appropriately feminist les bouchons de radiator for my next SUV.


Posted by on December 11, 2017 in Glory


Tags: , ,

Judith is takes the round way home

My friend recently referred to herself as “zaftig.” I have decided that is my new favorite word, preferred to “Rubenesque.”  According to Merriam-Webster, it means “of a woman – having a full rounded figure, pleasingly plump.”  Zaftig has been in use since the 1930s – deriving from the Yiddish zaftik, which means “juicy” or “succulent.”  Well, isn’t that delicious?

How appropriate that a Yiddish term should aptly describe this powerful portrait of Judith.

Giovanni Cariani (c. 1490–1547), Judith, c. 1510-15, Oil on panel. 69 x 56.5cm, Francesca and Massimo Valsecchi private collection

If you have read this blog before, you already know I prefer Judith to be powerful. And rather proud of her accomplishment. But not so proud or pleased that she creates the impression of a malevolent misandrist.

This Judith appears to strike the right balance of strength and resolve, fortitude and purpose. Although her maid may be in disarray and distress, Judith is portrayed as thoughtful and determined — on the way back to Bethulia to display her prize.

(I also love her jaunty pink sash and matching shawl. A heroine must dress the part!)

Compliments for this portrayal go to Giovanni Cariani, a High Renaissance artist style whose is considered a hybrid of his upbringing in Bergamo and training in Venice.  He first studied in the studio of Giovanni Bellini (c.1430-1516) — “Father of the Venetian Renaissance” — where he was exposed to the works of other well-known students, most notably Giorgione, Titian, Lorenzo Lotto, and Sebastiano del Piombo. The  exhibition In the Age of Giorgione (Royal Academy of Arts, London, March 12 to June 5, 2016) examined the various influences that shaped the work of many celebrated names in Renaissance art and, using this Judith as an example, Carina’s style was compared to his contemporaries. As one observer noted –

(In La Vecchia) Giorgione’s lowly sitter maintains a moving quality of self-possession and personal identity, which contrasts with the histrionics of the equivalent figure in Giovanni Cariani’s crude painting of Judith hanging nearby. (1)

Histrionics? HISTRONICS?!! What do you mean HISTRIONICS??!!!  She looks remarkably composed, considering she just behead a general in secret and is now covertly carrying his head in a bag past the rest of his army.

Unless … the critic is referring to the maid as the “equivalent figure” to La Vecchia … in which case I would have to agree.

Giorgione (1477-1510), La Vecchia (The Old Woman), c. 1508, Oil on canvas, 68 x 59 cm, Gallerie dell’Accademia, Venice, Italy


But back to Cariana.  His style could also be compared to Palma il Vecchio (c.1480-1528) and il Pordenone (c.1484-1539) — also of Lombardy and also working in Venice.  Palma il Vecchio did not train with Bellini as did Cariana, but he likely studied under Andrea Previtali (c.1480 –1528) – one of Bellini’s students. There is no documentation that the two artists ever studied or worked together, but certainly their style of sturdy figures in pastoral settings is a reflection of their similar paths. In fact, Palma il Vecchio’s Judith with the Head of Holofernes is one of the most zaftig portrayals I have reviewed. Il Pordenone (aka Giovanni Antonio de’ Sacchis) also portrayed Judith as sturdy – and has the distinction of three different portraits (seen in “Judith gets serious”). Neither did il Pordenone study with Bellini – but he was a rival to Titian. To the point that there was a rumor than Titian poisoned il Pordenone.

And I thought gossip and intrigue were modern inventions. Some things never change.

(1) Tom Nichols,  “EXHIBITION REVIEW: Giorgione. London,” The Burlington Magazine, June 2016, No. 1359 – Vol 158.






Leave a comment

Posted by on November 11, 2017 in Story


Tags: , , , ,

Judith makes a Happy Homemaker

My trip to The Dayton Art Institute re-envigorated my work on this blog and the pursuit of All Things Judith. I honestly thought I had exhausted the catalog of depictions of Judith – at least those from the before 2010. But I was wrong, and I am happy to be wrong (n this case only): there is more Judith to be found.

And some of it is not so far away.

In Judith Goes Exploring (I), I mused about a trip to the Detroit Institute of Arts to view Titian’s “Judith with the head of Holofernes” and Gentileshi’s “Judith and her Maidservant with the Head of Holofernes.” But somehow I missed this statuette by Antonio del Pollaiuolo.

Antonio del Pollaiuolo (1432-1498), “Judith”, c1470, bronze with traces of gilding, 50.8×22.9×10.2 cm,The Detroit Institute of Arts/Gift of Eleanor Clay Ford, Detroit, MI


Antonio del Pollaiuolo was a Renaissance artist in Florence – painter, sculptor, engraver and goldsmith – which leads me to ponder both the Renaissance and Florence and where he fit in with the other artists of his time period.  It is said the Renaissance began in Florence in the 14th century, spurred by a melting pot of factors including the unique political, social and civic aspects of Florence and the patronage of its dominant family, the Medici. The renewed interest in classical Greek and Roman aesthetics led to a humanistic and rational approach to literature, philosophy, art, music, politics, science, and religion – the focus turning to realism.  One of the major masterpieces of the Early Renaissance are the bronze doors of the Flofence Baptistery by Lorenzo Ghiberti that became famous from their unveiling and influenced subsequent artistic expression. And Pollaiuolo is part of this masterpiece, training in Ghiberti’s workshop along with other rising artists of the time: Donatello, Masolino, Michelozzo, and Uccello.

Of course, Donatello went on to produce his sublime David (c.1440s) and vicious Judith and Holofernes (1457–64). In fact, Pollaiuolo’s statuette has much in common with Donatello’s life size bronze, in terms of her flowing robes and the arm raised with the fachion. But Pollaiuolo’s Judith is minus the dying Holofernes at her feet and appears to be in a better mood with a slight smile on her face.

Perhaps there is a reason for her pleasant expression. Roger J. Crum, in The Sword Of Judith (Brine, Ciletti, and Lähnemann, 2010) surmises that – while David became the public face of Florence’s patriotism – while Judith was essentially back to her domestic life.

Whether representing the act of killing Holofernes, or literally showing a subsequent return to Bethulia, Florentine representations of Judith all variously imply or directly reference the eventual return to domestication of the heroine … Florentine images of Judith were predominantly private and domestic objects. With the exception of Ghiberti’s representation of Judith on the Gates of Paradise, which was obviously for public display, Donatello’s celebrated bronze group, several examples from Botticelli and his circle, a bronze statuette by Antonio del Pollaiuolo, and two engravings attributed to Baccio Baldini all come from the private sphere or were clearly intended for reception in non-public, intimate environments.

So this Judith becomes a household object – something to be a semblance and reminder of feminine virtues. And if you want your Judith to represent a Happy Homemaker, this particular statuette would fit the part nicely.

More reason for me to find time for that trip to Detroit!







Leave a comment

Posted by on November 10, 2017 in Glory


Tags: , , , , ,